Where the workflow shifted
MCP server, MCP tools, agent tools, and MCP security searches show that developers have moved from concept curiosity to safe integration questions.
If an AI tool supports MCP, the page should state what it can read, what it can change, which authorization it needs, where logs live, and how to disable it.
Tool names are not outcomes
The signal matters when it changes how a team ships, reviews, or recovers work, not when it only names another tool.
Check permissions and failure
- Add six fields to every tool page: capability, permission, data scope, installation, logging, and revocation
- Keep the test narrow: one low-risk task or tool entry before connecting permissions, logs, failure handling, and human takeover to production
What still needs proof
Vague permission language turns integration convenience into security and compliance doubt. Keep the original source open so the announcement, the evidence, and this site's interpretation stay separate.