Where the workflow shifted
Codex connects cloud software-engineering tasks, repository context, and development environments, so readers need to know what delivery evidence they will receive.
The first screen should explain which tasks fit an agent, what it can touch, what evidence it returns, and where human review belongs.
Tool names are not outcomes
The signal matters when it changes how a team ships, reviews, or recovers work, not when it only names another tool.
Check permissions and failure
- Rewrite developer-tool pages around four blocks: task input, execution scope, acceptance evidence, and rollback
- Keep the test narrow: one low-risk task or tool entry before connecting permissions, logs, failure handling, and human takeover to production
What still needs proof
Capability-only copy leaves teams guessing about permission, testing, and review cost. Keep the original source open so the announcement, the evidence, and this site's interpretation stay separate.