Where the workflow shifted
GitHub Copilot coding agent connects issues, branches, changes, tests, and pull-request review, making acceptance evidence part of the agent workflow.
Developer-tool pages should explain task input, repository instructions, test commands, review responsibility, and rollback so teams can judge how agent work gets accepted.
Tool names are not outcomes
The signal matters when it changes how a team ships, reviews, or recovers work, not when it only names another tool.
Check permissions and failure
- Add issue templates, AGENTS.md, test output, PR review, and rollback notes to the default flow
- Keep the test narrow: one low-risk task or tool entry before connecting permissions, logs, failure handling, and human takeover to production
What still needs proof
Automated code without acceptance evidence becomes review debt. Keep the original source open so the announcement, the evidence, and this site's interpretation stay separate.