Where the workflow shifted
Issue continuity is useful only when reader tasks are clearly different. Same-intent templates flatten reader progress.
Use a new job statement each day and only re-use evergreen pages when they directly serve the new task path.
Tool names are not outcomes
The signal matters when it changes how a team ships, reviews, or recovers work, not when it only names another tool.
Check permissions and failure
- Keep the daily thesis changed by problem scope, not by style line alone
- Keep the test narrow: one low-risk task or tool entry before connecting permissions, logs, failure handling, and human takeover to production
What still needs proof
Recycled issue logic will feel like one-site multiple titles. Keep the original source open so the announcement, the evidence, and this site's interpretation stay separate.