Where the workflow shifted
When readers see that AI can call tools, they ask which actions only read data and which submit, pay, publish, or delete.
Separate reading, generating, drafting, submitting, paying, publishing, and deleting into risk tiers with confirmation, logs, and human takeover.
Tool names are not outcomes
The signal matters when it changes how a team ships, reviews, or recovers work, not when it only names another tool.
Check permissions and failure
- Turn the first-screen promises on `ai-agent-governance` and `ai-agent-workflow` into action-tier checklists
- Keep the test narrow: one low-risk task or tool entry before connecting permissions, logs, failure handling, and human takeover to production
What still needs proof
Unclear action tiers make a useful agent look like uncontrolled automation. Keep the original source open so the announcement, the evidence, and this site's interpretation stay separate.